NFPA 10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers is undergoing a revision. The first meeting of the NFPA Technical Committee was held near the Chicago O’Hare airport on September 24-26, 2019. At the meeting, the committee developed a draft report of
proposed changes. As is usual, many changes are editorial in nature or clarifications of existing text, but some of the modifications and additions are more substantive. Here is an overview of some of the substantive changes that
will appear in the report that was posted on the NFPA website on February 9, 2020.
Extinguisher Swap-Outs
One of the biggest discussions in the industry these days is the practice of “swap-outs”. That is the term used whenever an installed extinguisher is replaced. For stored-pressure dry chemical extinguishers, this is typically done at the time when the
12-year hydrostatic test is due. Although it is common practice for service companies to leave a “loaner” when an extinguisher is removed for servicing, “swap-outs” have become more common in recent years.
A new provision will require that the owner be notified whenever there is a removal or replacement of an existing extinguisher. Additionally, explanatory material was added to the annex that provides guidance on the practice of swap-outs.
High Flow Extinguishers
Furnishings in buildings are classified as Class A common combustibles. Furnishings that also potentially involve flammable liquids are no longer Class A but become Class B hazards. The committee took the first step in recognizing this type of special
hazard with the development of new annex material that describes a fire involving furnishings soaked with a flammable liquid. The committee notes in the committee statement that large-capacity dry chemical extinguishers are needed for
Class A hazards that have the potential to involve flammable liquids. It is anticipated that further modifications will be made at the next committee meeting, regarding this type of hazard.
Signs for Extinguisher Cabinets
Changes were made to require extinguisher signs for extinguisher cabinets where the extinguisher cannot be readily seen. The intent is that the extinguisher inside the cabinet either needs to be visible or a sign needs to be installed. The new provisions
apply to cabinets that do not have transparent covers or windows in the doors and cabinets with extinguishers that are not visible from the normal path of travel.
Extinguishers for Protection of Electronic Equipment
New explanatory text was added to the annex that says extinguishers provided for the protection of delicate electronic equipment are typically halogenated agent and water mist extinguishers with Class A ratings. Although it is well established that clean
agent extinguishers are a match for computers, servers, telecommunications, and robotics, there is a need to emphasize that water mist extinguishers are also appropriate and have a Class C rating and contain de-ionized water with a low
mineral content. Consequently, they have many of the same applications as halogenated agents.
Extinguisher Theft Deterrent Devices
Extinguisher theft and tampering is a problem in some buildings, such as colleges and university dormitories, where extinguishers are installed in extinguisher cabinets. New annex text provides information that is useful for these situations. The new
explanatory material says that extinguishers in cabinets can be monitored for tampering or theft by theft deterrent devices that provide an alarm or other indication when the extinguisher is removed from the cabinet. This equipment is
important for areas where there is a need for monitoring extinguishers for theft.
Strap-Type Brackets
Since extinguishers installed in vehicles can become dislodged, they are required to have strap-type brackets. Although existing text is intended to also apply to other locations, it is often missed by users of the standard. Subsequently, a new paragraph
was added that specifically requires extinguishers subject to dislodgement to be installed with approved strap-type brackets, specifically designed to prevent dislodgement. The new provision should improve safety where dislodgement is
a potential hazard.
Extinguisher Cabinets with Scored Panels
Since it is unsafe to have a cabinet that has a scored front panel without a device for breaking the panel for immediate access to the extinguisher, a new paragraph was added to address this concern. The new text requires extinguisher cabinets with break-front
panels to be provided with breaker bars or hammers. Another new paragraph requires missing breaker bars or hammers and broken, damaged, or missing scored-panels to be replaced.
Monthly Inspections of Extinguishers
When a visual inspection is performed on an extinguisher, it is removed from its mounting location and examined. At that time, the extinguisher is hefted or weighed and corrective action is taken where needed. The revision makes the requirement for weighing
or hefting only applicable to self-expelling, cartridge-operated, and pump tank extinguishers, since the extinguisher gauge can often be relied upon to determine if an extinguisher is full. The change is intended to accommodate electronic
monitoring that does not include electronic weighing. The reliability of gauges came up during the debate and further changes might be needed during the next meeting.
Maintenance Records
At the time of the annual external examination, the monthly inspection items are also examined. A new paragraph now requires the monthly inspection items to be checked as part of the annual maintenance. Also a new paragraph permits the record for the
monthly inspection that is performed during annual maintenance to be recorded with the maintenance record and not recorded separately as an inspection. This change came about because of confusion in the field. The result will clarify that
a separate monthly inspection and separate record for that inspection is not needed during the month that an annual external examination is performed.
Water Mist Extinguishers
Since all water mist extinguishers should contain an agent that is electrically nonconductive, paragraph 4.1.4.3 is being deleted. The deletion may not be enough to solve problems in the field and is likely to be further modified during the second revision
meeting. At issue is whether a water mist extinguisher manufactured prior to August 15, 2002, should be removed from service or simply have the agent comply with the electrical conductivity requirements (de-ionized water). Replacing the
agent in these extinguishers with newer de-ionized water replacement agent creates a conflict with the extinguisher nameplate information. The deletion of text does not resolve this problem. Further discussions are needed to resolve this
issue.
Foam Agent Replacement
Existing text requires foam extinguishing agent to be replaced every 3 years and a hydrostatic test performed every 5 years. A change was made to require the replacement interval to be in accordance with the extinguisher manufacturer’s instructions and
not to exceed the 5-year hydrostatic test interval. This will require diligence on the part of servicing companies, as some manufacturer’s instructions dictate a 3-year replacement, while others allow 5-year replacement.
Pressure Gauges
A new requirement was added to mandate the replacement of broken, cracked, illegible, damaged, nonworking, or water-contaminated pressure gauges. Although this seems obvious, the standard has never mandated it. This change is intended to improve safety
and require more diligence in examining gauges and replacement of those that are no longer in a usable condition.
What is Next?
Public comments on the first draft revision are due May 6, 2020, and the committee must meet by November 2020 to develop their second and final report on recommended changes to NFPA 10. The next edition of NFPA will be issued by the NFPA Standards Council
in August of 2021, which will allow for any final public debates to occur during the NFPA Convention and Expo in June of 2021.